Brian solves the NYT puzzle: Sunday, 5-31-09
Two Trivia Boxes kept me from a true no-Google puzzle. I need to find a distinction between the true no-Google (zero assistance from anywhere), the partial no-Google (checking the validity of an already believed-to-be-accurate answer with xwordinfo.com [or by "guessing" via the applet]) and a full non-no-Google (blatant cheating). These distinctions need names. Yesterday (Saturday), I needed a lot of help from xwordinfo (since many of my efforts at validation went poorly). Today, I had just two guessing squares. And once I learned them (they were both the letter D), the answers made no more sense than they had when I was cycling through the alphabet looking for guesses.
Trivia Boxes du jour:
25D. Sea lily, e.g. (CRINOID) and 59A. Oregon city, with “The” (DALLES). My other two prime candidates here were S and R, either of which seemed to be equally realistic sounding without making any less sense for 25D. I think any consonant would have been acceptable for 59A, and even a vowel or two. I’m looking through the Wikipedia page for The Dalles, and almost every link they offer is for something else I’ve never heard of. Wasco County? Columnar basalt? The 2000 census? Is this an actual thing, The Dalles? Maybe I’ll use AROOSTOOK in a puzzle someday. It’s a county in Maine. Seems about as random, except I’m from Maine, so I’ve heard of it. As for the sea lily, I think this photo of a fossil of one is about as suggestive as a Georgia O’Keeffe painting. Maybe CRINOID means more than we think.- 60A. King of England, 946-55 (EDRED) and 56D. Italian Renaissance composer Banchieri (ADRIANO). Come on. This is ridiculous. Two obscure names, neither of which exists anywhere in the world. Banchieri apparently helped develop the ever-popular madrigal comedy. This was a series of songs, sung a cappella, which followed a vague plot. Take away the plot, and it sounds like something I did in college about twice a month. Who knew I was so close to 16th century Italian music? And Edred’s mother’s name was Eadgifu. Look for her in next Sunday’s puzzle.
How about the fact that TERENCE (54D. Ancient playwright who originated the phrase “While there’s life, there’s hope”) has appeared two days in a row? Terence also said, “so many men, so many opinons.” This is way too true.
Oh, it’s Sunday, so we have a super-sized grid with a big-time theme, right? No, not really. This was basically a 21×21 themeless some long answers that satisfied a clever rule, but left a final gimmick somewhat flat. The theme is described in the notepad (if you use Across Lite), and probably appears somewhere on the page (if you use the newspaper). It said “Every letter in the answer to each asterisked clue appears an even number of times in that answer… except one. Altogether, these eight unpaired letters can be arranged to spell the answer to 68- and 70-Across.”
What?
Will Shortz, I would ask that a little more attention be paid to these sorts of notes. This one seems to barely explain what it’s supposed to explain. And even after figuring out what this meant, it did little to help figure out the puzzle. And even after figuring out the puzzle, the entries at 68- and 70-Across were kind of bland. Some people are ___ crosswords. And the answer is NUTS OVER. As my wife would say, “Meh.” Slightly more interesting were the simple existences of those eight long entries:
- 3D. Not firm work? : PRIVATE PRACTICE
- 23A. Religious affiliation of John Adams and William Howard Taft : UNITARIAN CHURCH
33A. You raise your arms for these : ANTI-PERSPIRANTS. I discovered recently that my father uses Tag. This is the one that has the commercials where the moment the guy puts it on, tons of hot girls swarm him. I wonder if my dad has seen these ads.- 46D. Real work : STRENUOUS EFFORT
- 49A. Physician’s promise : HIPPOCRATIC OATH. To whom does the physician make this promise? I understand that it is the vow to uphold the whatever of the patients’ whatever, but to whom is this vow delivered? I’ve never heard a doctor speak any of it to me. Am I (unfortunately) exempt from this oath’s requirements?
- 86A. Hides out : GOES UNDERGROUND
- 102A. Deficits : INSUFFICIENCIES
- 116A. Ragged : TATTERED AND TORN
There’s a ton more words in this puzzle, but I have to leave this alone for the night. I’m still swamped with work, and it doesn’t let up much until October. So there you have it. A fine, although not thrilling, Sunday puzzle.
In other news, I’m still doing a bunch of old Thursday and Friday Sun puzzles when I have the time. They are awesome. Just sayin’.
Somewhat non-no-Google streak: 2. Bleah.
See you Monday.
I would categorize today’s Randolph Ross puzzle as “Lost,” Season Two, but beginning with the second episode. See, in the second season of “Lost,” the first five minutes of the first episode were awesome. Just awesome. After that, it got very plain. And shortly after that, despite moments of excitement, it got just stupid. (Yes, yes, this is my blatant invitation for the comments below to digress away from the puzzle and into a battle of whether “Lost” has any value. I say it does not. Ryan loves it. Whatever.) My point is that Mr. Ross did not grab us with a knockout 1-Across (Place holder? : DIGIT), and only a vaguely cute 1-Down (Pops : DEAR OLD DAD). In fact, for my money ($39.95 divided by 365 puzzles is about… eleven cents?), the first truly exciting entry in the grid doesn’t show up until… now that I look closer, there really isn’t one. Maybe this is Season Three of “Lost.” Or the lousy current season of “Scrubs.” I’m just not moved much by this fill.


an and I are working to get a puzzle of our own in the New York Times. I’m trying to come up with wonderful clever themes because I am in such awe of all the wonderful themes out there. Today’s puzzle is fine, but it seems barely themed. We needed more movies with more trees. What about HAP



