Rabbits! And… 8 + 1 = 9, or something!
We are officially three weeks away from Lollapuzzoola 2! This is going to be the best second tournament Ryan and I have ever hosted. If you think you’re sick of us promoting it, just wait until we spend about four months of podcasts on the recap! Woohoo!
Speaking of the podcast — if you’re a blog-reader and you tried listening to “Fill Me In,” but just got too confused — we now have a page devoted to explaining what the hell is going on. Check it out.
Okay, let’s quickly recap this Saturday offering from Martin Ashwood-Smith. He combined wide open spaces (awesome) with some very tight passageways (not so awesome), making this almost three separate puzzles with barely a crossover between. Let’s take a look.
Do you see where 3D. Big name in slapstick (JERRY LEWIS) and 35A. One may be out of control (SITUATION) cross at the I? That’s our passageway from the northwest onto the center. Similarly, the O between 29A. Creator of a comic strip duo named after a theologian and a philosopher (WATTERSON – the comic is Calvin & Hobbes, and this was my first entry into the grid) and 27D. 1947 western serial film (SON OF ZORRO) – this is our other passageway. Very tight squeeze to connect the segments, which makes the solve so much trickier. Plus, those passageways were full of very common letters (I, S, O, N), which is all but useless for sparking an idea in my brain.
All that said — the wide open stuff was fantastic. That seven-letter sash down the center of the grid was wonderful, and had some great fill: PARTOOK, CATBIRD, JERBOAS, SELKIRK – see, these words have plenty of the letters I need in my passageways!
I’m curious — Martin (if you’re reading this) or anyone else (if you’re reading this), tell me about these passageways. Do you put basic letters there on purpose to make the solve trickier? Do you make the passageways tighter on purpose? What’s the strategy, from a constructor’s point of view? I solved the whole SE first, and had no clue how to get out. Then I finished the NW, and still my center had WATTERSON and nothing else.
Also, from a constructor perspective — what do you think about the single black squares breaking up the otherwise cavernous NW and SE? I’m sure the fill is infinitely more difficult without those squares, but would it be worth the effort? Would that have made a better puzzle? Or a worse one? Just curious… I’m in a curious way. It’s 3:15 in the morning, and I should have been asleep hours ago.
Yes, hours ago… Okay, I’m off to bed. See you in the morning, perhaps.